Author
Ahmed Barakat
Author
Share
Fact Checked by
CryptoNews Editorial Team
Author
Clearpool holders approved a 1:1 migration from Ethereum-based CPOOL to XRP Ledger-based CLEAR by 97%, while XRP traded near $1.50 as the news unfolded. The vote strengthens XRPL’s institutional-credit offering. The planned loans use RLUSD, and Clearpool’s token buybacks are intended to support CLEAR.
Clearpool focuses on private credit and has facilitated more than $930 million in institutional loans since 2021. Under the approved plan, each CPOOL token is to be exchanged for one CLEAR token, moving the project’s token activity from Ethereum to the XRP Ledger. The report put the anticipated CLEAR circulation at approximately 1.1 billion tokens at launch.
The Q4 2026 target leaves execution, token distribution, and the migration itself ahead; the vote is evidence of community approval, not proof that the new token or lending activity has already gone live on XRPL.
Clearpool’s institutional-credit strategy already involves Ripple and other partners. Ripple, Clearpool, and Cicada Partners established a credit fund on August 21: Ripple participates as a limited partner, Cicada evaluates borrowers, and Hex Trust oversees assets.
The expansion fits a wider push to develop lending and institutional-finance functionality on the ledger. That infrastructure can deepen XRPL’s use, but XRPL lending developments do not, by themselves, establish that XRP will capture the economic value created by every application.
Earn $50 and Enter $300K Prize Draw on EdgeX
RLUSD Settlement Helps XRP Demand?
The fund’s loans are made in RLUSD, Ripple’s dollar-pegged stablecoin, rather than XRP. XRP’s principal role in the described transactions is paying small XRP Ledger fees, which are burned. That creates some transaction-level use of XRP, but it does not show that loan growth will generate material buying demand for the token.
Clearpool’s fee design sharpens the distinction. The project plans to direct half of its protocol fees toward buying back and burning CLEAR, so that mechanism supports the migrated protocol token rather than XRP. XRPL activity, RLUSD use, and CLEAR token economics may all grow together while XRP receives only the relatively small demand associated with network fees.
As of today, XRP was about 50% lower over the preceding year and roughly 59% below its July 2025 all-time high of $3.65. At this scale, a new application announcement needs a substantial and demonstrable flow of incremental demand to move price materially.
Another institutional product on the XRP Ledger can be relevant to the network’s long-term development without changing the near-term balance of buyers and sellers in XRP. A separate institutional project on the XRP Ledger illustrates the same analytical distinction: infrastructure adoption is not automatically equivalent to direct token demand.
Trade XRP on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop
What Would Turn XRPL News and Adoption Into a Stronger XRP Catalyst?
If Clearpool’s lending remains denominated in RLUSD and XRP is used mainly for ledger fees, network activity could rise without a comparable increase in direct XRP demand. The migration could still matter for XRPL adoption and Clearpool’s reach, but those are separate investment propositions from a near-term repricing of XRP.
The thesis would look different if loan activity began using XRP as collateral, if the platform created meaningful cross-currency settlement flows involving XRP, or if it generated material demand for XRP liquidity. Those mechanisms would connect protocol growth more directly to the asset.
For traders, the key distinction is between adoption headlines and flows that change token demand. XRP price action and potential breakout conditions require their own news and confirmation; the XRP range and breakout setup is a separate market question from Clearpool’s governance vote.
Discover: The Best Token Presales